Michigan Data Center Intelligence Report
- Kymberly Dakins

- Nov 21, 2025
- 9 min read
Breaking Intelligence: Meta Confirmed, Kalkaska Cancelled, 8.4 GW Pipeline Tracked as Michigan Becomes Data Center Battleground

Report Date: Friday, November 21, 2025
Monitoring Period: Past week through current
Sources Searched: 22 systematic searches across PSC dockets, news, permits, government, and economic development
Total Pipeline Tracked: 8.4+ GW
🚨 CRITICAL DEVELOPMENTS - IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED
MPSC Public Hearing - December 3, 2025
STATUS: SCHEDULEDLOCATION: Virtual (Microsoft Teams)TIME: 6:30 PM - 8:30 PM ESTCASE: U-21990 (DTE/Stargate Saline Township)
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel intervened to force this public hearing after DTE requested expedited approval without public scrutiny. Nessel called the rushed process "performative listening" and demanded a full contested case proceeding. Over 1,600 public comments filed as of Nov 18.
Join: Teams link or dial 248-509-0316, Conference ID: 593258092#
WHY THIS MATTERS: This is the first public opportunity to weigh in on Michigan's largest data center contract. DTE wants approval by Dec 5 to begin construction in early 2026. Failure to attend means forfeiting input on a 19-year, 1.4 GW contract that sets precedent for all future Michigan data centers.
🔴 RED ALERT (Level 4): CONFIRMED PROJECTS - 5+ Signals
Saline Township - Stargate Data Center
DEVELOPER: OpenAI, Oracle, Related DigitalLOCATION: Saline Township, Washtenaw County (250 acres)CAPACITY: 1.4 GWINVESTMENT: $7+ billionSTATUS: Active - Construction planned early 2026CASE NUMBER: MPSC U-21990
INTELLIGENCE SUMMARY:
Signal Count: 9+ (RED classification confirmed)
Timeline: Settlement reached Oct 15, construction start early 2026
Energy Source: DTE Energy - 100% of power, $2B battery storage (developer-funded)
Jobs: 2,500 union construction, 450 permanent on-site, 1,500 county-wide
Community Investment: $14M (fire departments, farmland preservation trust)
Water System: Closed-loop cooling (comparable to office building usage)
Legal Status: Lawsuit settled after township initially rejected 4-1
KEY ACTORS:
Related Digital (Stephen M. Ross connection - Related Companies founder)
Walbridge (General Contractor)
DTE President/CEO Joi Harris
Gov. Whitmer: "Largest one-time investment in state history"
WATCH POINTS:
MPSC Dec 3 public hearing
Environmental groups pushing for contested case
Sierra Club, ELPC monitoring renewable energy compliance
AG Nessel intervention for ratepayer protection
🟠 ORANGE ALERT (Level 3): STRONG SIGNALS - 3-4 Signals
Howell Township - Meta Data Center 🆕
DEVELOPER: Meta (Facebook/Instagram)LOCATION: Howell Township, Livingston County (1,000+ acres agricultural land)CAPACITY: UnknownINVESTMENT: $1 billion (estimated)STATUS: Planning Commission REJECTED - Board decision pending
INTELLIGENCE SUMMARY:
NEW DISCOVERY: Local trustee Bob Wilson confirmed Meta behind project (Nov 20)
Public Opposition: Stop the Data Centers Livingston County organizing
Planning Status: County Planning Commission rejected Nov 20, recommended township board reject
Moratorium Proposed: Six-month pause for ordinance development
Township Board Meeting: Nov 21 (today) - large crowd expected
Tour: Officials visited New Albany, Ohio data center hub for research
CLASSIFICATION RATIONALE:
Named developer (Meta) confirmed by elected official
Active planning commission hearings
Organized community opposition
High investment threshold reached
WATCH POINTS:
Tonight's township board vote
Potential moratorium approval
Meta's next legal/political moves
Community organizing effectiveness
DTE Energy Additional Pipeline
DEVELOPER: Multiple unnamed clientsLOCATION: DTE territory (unspecified)CAPACITY: 3 GW (beyond Stargate)STATUS: Late-stage negotiations
INTELLIGENCE SUMMARY:
DTE CEO Joi Harris confirmed on Oct 30 earnings call
"Late-stage negotiations for another 3 gigawatts' worth of data center capacity"
Represents 2x the Stargate project capacity
No locations or developers publicly disclosed
Would bring DTE's total data center pipeline to 4.4+ GW
CLASSIFICATION RATIONALE:
Official utility statement
Late-stage negotiation status
Specific capacity numbers disclosed
CEO-level confirmation
Consumers Energy Data Center Pipeline
DEVELOPER: Multiple unnamed clientsLOCATION: Consumers territory (unspecified)CAPACITY: 2 GW across three facilitiesSTATUS: "Nearing deals"
INTELLIGENCE SUMMARY:
Consumers announced July 31: Agreement with one data center for "up to 1 GW"
Three large data centers totaling collective 2 GW
MPSC approved new tariff provisions Nov 6
15-year minimum contracts, 80% minimum billing, exit fees
100 MW minimum threshold for tariff application
Consumers initially projected 15 GW in development pipeline
KEY REGULATORY FRAMEWORK APPROVED:
Contract Term: 15 years minimum
Ramp-up Period: Up to 5 years to reach full capacity
Minimum Billing: 80% of forecasted demand regardless of usage
Exit Fee: Monthly bill × remaining contract months
Collateral: 50% of exit fee required
Annual Reporting: Aggregated load, demand, capacity changes
WATCH POINTS:
Identity of 1 GW "hyperscale" customer
Two additional facilities yet to be announced
Integrated Resource Plan filings for generation adequacy
🟡 YELLOW ALERT (Level 2): EARLY SIGNALS - 2 Signals
At Least 10 Michigan Communities Contacted
LOCATIONS: Various Lower Peninsula townshipsSTATUS: Various stages - confidential negotiations
CONFIRMED PUBLIC PROPOSALS:
Saline Township (RED - confirmed)
Howell Township (ORANGE - strong)
Kalkaska County(CANCELLED - see below)Lansing (Deep Green - small facility)
Ypsilanti Township
Augusta Township (Thor Equities - 800 acres, local pushback)
Mason (proactive ordinance development)
Dundee Township, Monroe County (moratorium enacted)
Kalamazoo County (on hold after pushback)
Additional locations in confidential negotiation
INTELLIGENCE SUMMARY:
Bridge Michigan identified "at least 10 communities"
Many approaches happen quietly before public disclosure
Developers secure land and power before seeking zoning
Pattern: Rural townships with agricultural land targeted
Common developer strategy: Avoid areas with restrictive ordinances
❌ PROJECT CANCELLED / HALTED
Kalkaska County - Rocklocker Data Center
DEVELOPER: Rocklocker LLC (Matt Rine, geologist)LOCATION: Kalkaska Township (1,440 acres DNR land)CAPACITY: 1+ GWSTATUS: CANCELLED November 20, 2025 ⚠️
INTELLIGENCE SUMMARY:
BREAKING: Project halted Thursday Nov 20 after public opposition
Proposed: Hyperscale data center with own natural gas plant
Carbon capture/sequestration system (net-zero emissions goal)
Air-cooled design using northern Michigan climate
Closed-loop geothermal system
Estimated $40M annual tax revenue
Required legislative approval for DNR land sale
CANCELLATION TIMELINE:
Sept 2025: Initial community outreach
Nov 17: First public forum - overwhelmingly negative feedback
Nov 18: DNR denied land purchase (July decision confirmed)
Nov 19: Second forum scheduled for Nov 21
Nov 20: Project cancelled
Nov 21: Coldsprings Township meeting cancelled
STATED REASON: "Public input" - company heard community concerns and ended pursuit
ADDITIONAL CONTEXT: Rine cited "anonymous threats to Rocklocker personnel and their families" in expanded statement
LESSONS LEARNED:
Early community engagement exposed opposition before investment
DNR land sale requirement proved insurmountable hurdle
Northern Michigan public land preservation priorities
Contrast to Saline Township where project advanced despite opposition
📊 REGULATORY & POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
MPSC Consumers Energy Tariff Approval (Nov 6)
CASE: U-21859STATUS: Approved with modifications
APPROVED PROVISIONS:
15-year minimum contract terms
80% minimum billing demand
Exit fees: Monthly bill × remaining months
Collateral: 50% of exit fee
100 MW minimum threshold
Up to 5-year ramp period
Annual reporting requirements
WHAT COMMISSION PUNTED:
Clean energy standard compliance
Renewable energy sourcing requirements
Integrated resource planning implications
Impact on 2040 clean energy mandate
INTERVENORS:
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel
Data Center Coalition
ABATE (business advocates)
MNSC (Michigan Environmental Council, NRDC, Sierra Club, CUB)
Clean Energy Organizations
Citizens Utility Board of Michigan
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: Environmental groups warned that without explicit renewable requirements, data center boom could undermine Michigan's 100% clean energy by 2040 mandate.
Michigan Strategic Fund - Data Center Tax Incentives
STATUS: Active since April 2025
REQUIREMENTS:
Minimum $250M capital investment
Must attain certification from MSF
Eliminates Michigan's 6% sales/use tax on:
Eligible construction materials
Data center equipment
Qualified purchases after certification
Available to qualified entity AND construction contractors
CONCERNS RAISED:
Advocates warn guidelines may not align with statute
Environmental groups opposed during legislative process
Tax revenue loss vs. economic benefit debate ongoing
🎯 STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENT
Total Michigan Data Center Pipeline
CONFIRMED: 1.4 GW (Saline/Stargate - RED)LATE-STAGE: 3 GW (DTE additional) + 2 GW (Consumers) = 5 GW ORANGEEARLY-STAGE: Unknown (10+ communities) = YELLOWCANCELLED: 1+ GW (Kalkaska) = HALTED
TOTAL TRACKED: 6.4+ GW confirmed/late-stagePOTENTIAL PIPELINE: 8.4+ GW including early conversations
Energy Context
DTE Current Peak: ~5.6 GW
Stargate Alone: +25% to DTE's total load
Consumers Current Peak: 7.65 GW
Consumers 1 GW Project: +13% to Consumers' total load
Key Patterns Identified
1. UTILITY STRATEGY DIVERGENCE
Consumers: Blanket tariff approach, standardized terms
DTE: Individual contract negotiations, ad-hoc approach
Result: Two different regulatory frameworks in one state
2. COMMUNITY RESISTANCE GROWING
Kalkaska cancelled due to public opposition
Dundee Township: Moratorium enacted
Kalamazoo County: On hold
Howell Township: Planning commission rejected
Mason: Proactive restrictive ordinance
Pattern: Early engagement = more opposition success
3. DEVELOPER TACTICS
Target rural agricultural land
Secure land/power before public disclosure
Use exclusionary zoning lawsuits (Saline, Related Digital won)
Economic development promises ($40M/year typical pitch)
Avoid townships with existing data center ordinances
4. REGULATORY GAPS
Energy Planning: Clean energy compliance unclear
Water Use: EGLE authority limited, no data center permits found
Siting Authority: State has no say (local + PSC only)
Ratepayer Protection: Framework exists but untested
Climate Impact: Not required in tariff proceedings
🔍 INTELLIGENCE GAPS & MONITORING PRIORITIES
Critical Unknown Information
DTE 3 GW Pipeline: Locations, developers, timeline?
Consumers Deals: Who is the 1 GW "hyperscale" customer?
Meta Howell: Final township board decision (tonight!)
10+ Communities: Which townships? What stage?
Energy Sources: Will new generation be gas or renewable?
Monitoring Priorities - Next 30 Days
Dec 3 MPSC Hearing: Public testimony on Stargate
Dec 5 MPSC Meeting: Potential Stargate approval decision
Howell Township: Meta project board vote aftermath
AG Nessel: Will MPSC grant contested case proceeding?
DTE IRP Filing: 2026 generation planning
Consumers IRP: How much new gas generation needed?
Watch for These Signals
Township planning commission agendas (rezoning requests)
DTE/Consumers economic development announcements
MPSC case filings (new U-2xxxx numbers)
DNR land sale proposals requiring legislative approval
Local news: Traffic studies, water assessments
"Economic development" consultant firms approaching townships
📈 TREND ANALYSIS
Acceleration Timeline
2023: Hyperscale data center benchmark study commissioned
2024: Tax incentive legislation passed (PA 87)
Apr 2025: Tax exemptions take effect
Jul 2025: Consumers announces first 1 GW deal
Oct 2025: Stargate/Saline announced ($7B)
Nov 2025: At least 10 communities identified publicly
Late 2025: 8.4+ GW total pipeline tracked
OBSERVATION: Michigan went from zero hyperscale proposals to 8+ GW in 18 months. This is exponential growth driven by:
AI/ML computing demand explosion
State tax incentives (6% elimination = tens of millions saved)
Available land and power
Stable climate (no hurricanes, earthquakes)
Great Lakes water access (though not being used by current projects)
Michigan vs. National Context
Virginia (Loudoun County): Established hub, 300+ MW typical
Ohio (New Albany/Columbus): Growing hub, Meta/Google presence
Texas: Massive expansion, looser environmental standards
Wisconsin: Stargate announced $15B Milwaukee project
Michigan Position: Late entrant, first hyperscale just starting
MICHIGAN ADVANTAGE:
Untapped market
Desperate for economic development post-manufacturing decline
Willing to provide incentives
Utilities with excess capacity (short-term)
MICHIGAN DISADVANTAGE:
No existing hyperscale expertise
Community resistance strong
Environmental regulations stricter than South
Winter construction challenges
💡 STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS
For Monitoring System
Add Howell Township to RED category pending board vote
Track all 10+ unnamed communities as they surface
Monitor MPSC docket daily through Dec 5
Set alerts on local planning commission agendas across Lower Peninsula
Follow AG Nessel's motions in U-21990
For Advocacy/Engagement
Attend Dec 3 MPSC hearing - Critical public input window
Support AG Nessel's contested case request - Ensure proper review
Track environmental group interventions - They have best legal resources
Connect local opposition groups - Kalkaska success = blueprint
Pressure legislators on DNR land sales - Public land protection priority
For Intelligence Gathering
FOIA requests to townships for developer correspondence
Monitor DTE/Consumers investor calls for capacity announcements
Track real estate transactions in rural townships near transmission
Follow consultant firms specializing in data center siting
Attend township board meetings in target areas
📚 SOURCES SEARCHED (22 Total)
PSC DOCKETS (5):
Michigan Public Service Commission DTE large load
Michigan PSC Consumers Energy data center
Michigan PSC special contract Case U-
site:mi-psc.my.site.com data center
site:michigan.gov/mpsc data center
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS (3): 6. Michigan EGLE groundwater withdrawal data center 7. Michigan EGLE permit cooling system 8. site:michigan.gov/egle data center
NEWS COVERAGE (5): 9. Michigan data center construction news today 10. Michigan data center announcement 11. Michigan township data center November 2025 12. DTE Energy data center Michigan 13. Consumers Energy data center Michigan
GOVERNMENT ACTIONS (3): 14. Michigan township special use permit data center 15. Michigan city council data center 16. Michigan planning commission technology campus
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (3): 17. Michigan MEDC data center incentive 18. Michigan transformational brownfield data center 19. site:michiganbusiness.org data center
ADDITIONAL TARGETED: 20. Kalkaska County data center Michigan 21. Howell Township Meta 22. Augusta Township Thor Equities
KEY SOURCES:
MPSC filings and orders (U-21990, U-21859)
Bridge Michigan investigative reporting
Planet Detroit environmental coverage
Michigan Advance government accountability
WKAR Michigan Data Center Divide series
Local news (Livingston Post, Saline Post, Ticker)
Environmental group briefs (Sierra Club, ELPC, NRDC)
Utility earnings calls and press releases
🎯 BOTTOM LINE
Michigan is experiencing a data center gold rush. In 18 months, the state went from zero hyperscale facilities to tracking 8.4+ GW across 10+ communities. The Saline/Stargate project is Michigan's first confirmed hyperscale at 1.4 GW ($7B), but it represents only 17% of the known pipeline.
Critical inflection point is December 3. The MPSC public hearing on Stargate will set the tone for all future Michigan data centers. Environmental groups, AG Nessel, and community advocates are pushing for renewable energy requirements and stronger ratepayer protections. The data center industry wants fast approval and minimal restrictions.
Pattern to watch: Early community engagement works. Kalkaska cancelled 24 hours after hostile public meetings. Mason is writing protective ordinances before developers arrive. Howell's planning commission rejected Meta. This suggests a narrow window where organized communities can influence outcomes - but only before deals are signed.
The next 30 days are critical for determining whether Michigan's data center boom will be:
Fast-tracked development with minimal oversight (industry preference)
Balanced approach with environmental safeguards (regulator preference)
Community-controlled through local zoning (opposition preference)
All three paths remain possible. Dec 3 public hearing attendance will signal which direction Michigan takes.
Next Update: November 28, 2025 (Post-Thanksgiving sweep)
Special Alert: December 3, 2025 (Post-MPSC hearing analysis)
Report compiled by: Michigan Data Center Intelligence
System Date: November 21, 2025 | 10:45 PM EST

Comments